EaP Think Tank Network
Prospects for the Use of Frozen Assets of the Central Bank of Russia
All rights reserved Shutterstock / Leka Sergeeva
Republished Content

Prospects for the Use of Frozen Assets of the Central Bank of Russia

Diclaimer: This content was not edited by the German Council on Foreign relations (DGAP).

In response to Russia’s aggression against Ukraine in 2022 the G7, working closely with the European Union, set the direction followed by other democratic countries siding with Ukraine as the victim of Russian aggression. Multi-vectoral actions involved the freezing of Russian state assets deposited under their jurisdictions, including those of the Central Bank of Russia (CBR).

Almost as soon as the CBR funds were blocked, a discussion about the future of these assets began among G7 members, which has intensified in recent months. With another year of war, the countries involved in supporting Ukraine began to look for options to reduce the burden on their budgets by finding new sources of funding for their assistance. As the cost of rebuilding Ukraine is estimated to be at least $500 billion and possibly $1 trillion, the freezing of around $300 billion is also seen as a potentially important source of funds that could be used to lift Ukraine out of war damage. At the same time, this could act as a deterrent for other states to abandon actions that so blatantly violate the existing international order.

This report seeks to contribute to the political and expert debate on the future of CBR frozen assets as an important tool for exerting pressure on Russia and supporting Ukraine. It analyses the political, legal and economic background to potential decisions together with five main scenarios for the use of frozen CBR funds:

  • direct confiscation and transfer to Ukraine
  • payment of compensation awarded by international courts and tribunals
  • payment of damages awarded by the international claims commission
  • using CBR assets as collateral for loans or bonds
  • treating CBR assets as collateral for reparation payments under a future peace agreement.

Read the full report by the Polish Institute of International Affairs here.

Stefania Kolarz and Szymon Zaręba

Publications

Discover articles
Read more
What is the Future of the European Neighbourhood Policy?
Stefan Meister
Russia’s war against Ukraine has fundamentally changed the EU’s Eastern Neighborhood and its policy towards the region. We observe a fragmentation betw...
EU Policy in Its Eastern Neighborhood: What is Needed for the Region?
Laure Delcour
Over the past fifteen years, the EU’s Eastern Neighborhood has undergone two profound transformations that have fundamentally altered both the region’s pol...
Retiring the Eastern Partnership: What Comes Next?
Steven Blockmans
The Eastern Partnership (EaP) has become an increasingly outdated framework to structure the EU’s relations with six neighboring states whose paths have diverged sharply since 2022.